|

ITEMS OF CLOTHING
UNDERWEAR
THE
CHEMISE
BREASTCOVERINGS
UNDERPANTS
HOSE & GARTERS
|
Breast
Coverings
A question of supporting the female form
Many will be surprised to know
that underwear, particularly items to enhance or repress the bustline
is not an altogether new phenomenon only devised in the last two hundred
years. Any large-breasted modern woman could certainly feel that her forebears
would have encountered the same need for comfort and support that she
herself feels today. 
Bust support goes back as far back as antiquity. The image at right shows
a mosaic of female athletes wearing breast coverings to support the bust
dating from 400 AD. These garments are almost identical to light strapless
bras which we have today. A small amount of bust suppost has perservered
on and off throughout history, and while not much is written about bust
coverings until later times, it is not altogether unreasonable that women
maintained an interest in support (for larger ladies) and enhancement
(for smaller ones).
Existing garments
Until 2008, no garment which may have fallen into the category of medieval
bust support had been found. In July 2008 investigations for re-construction
were carried out at the Castle Lengberg in Nikolsdorf, East Tyrol, Austria.
A vaulted spandrel was discovered in the south wing which was filled with
backfill- possibly to level the floor when a further level was added..The
fill was stored for subsequent sorting at a later date. When examined,
it was revealed that the fill consisted of layers of dry material, among
them organic material- twigs and straw, but also worked wood, leather
(mainly shoes) and textiles.
Beatrix Nutz was part of the archaeological team who investigated
the textile fragments, and wrote an astonishing account of her findings:
..The textile finds consist of some
hundred fragments as well as of few almostcompletely preserved pieces.
Amid them were several nearly complete linen bras and fragments of corselettes,
some rather coarsely made others more elaborately decorated with plaited
borders and sprang worked parts. One of the bras even has a rather modern
look. As there seems to be no clear evidence on the existence of bras
in the 15th century other explanations of them being among the finds
were sought for. But none of them proofed completely satisfying. On
the contrary a closer examination of the pieces in question showed
that no textile techniques were used in their construction that would
not fit to the time period. All applied techniques were common during
the 15th century and none of them developed later. Besides - all other
textiles from this find, like fragments of dresses, shirts, trousers,
laces etc., fit well to the 15th century...
The use of the words 'bra' and 'corselettes'
are, of course, our modern words. The garments would most likely have
been known under different names at the time of use, although to the best
of my knowledge, I have no real idea what they might be.
Support
for medieval bust support
During the Middle Ages, noble women
wore linen under their expensive outer clothes to both protect their expensive
clothes from the sweat and odour of their bodies and to provide an extra
layer of warmth. Underdresses were exceedingly fitted in cut and were
tightly laced to provide support even for a large breast. Garments such
as these would render further bust support in the form of another item
of clothing completely unnecessary for small-breasted women or women of
average size, but the larger lady may still have felt the need for more
support. Many contemporary images show women with busts unnaturally high,
hinting at bust support and/or enhancement.
During the fourteenth century, women whose means permitted them to do
so began wearing stiff linen under their bodice called a cotte, a French
word meaning rib, which was designed to flattened the breast. According
to Steele,
...woman used paste as stiffener between
the two layers of linen to create a stiffer, harder bodice, creating
the earliest form of the corset.
A garment listed as a corset does appear
in some early household accounts of Edward the Black Prince but owing
to the vast amounts of fabric and fur required to make them, coupled with
some of the descriptions, it seems to be an entirely different type of
garment to the one we call a corset today. This is discussed on the CORSET
page. The corset or any other undergarment as we know it today, should
it have existed in the medieval period, was certainly known under another
name, which is still not known. The early renaissance brings us the garment
known as a pair of bodies, a laced undergarment similar to our
corset today.
In Umberto Eco's book,
Art & Beauty in the Middle Ages, he wrote that Gilbert of Hoyt
defined the correct dimensions of the female breasts if they are to be
truly pleasing. In the Sermons in Continuum Salomonis, he reminds
us of the ladies of medieval miniaturists, their tight 'corsets' binding
and raising the bosom. When the word 'corset' is used in this sense, it
is unclear whether this is the modern translation for the word he used
originally. He writes:
The breasts are most pleasing when they
are of moderate size and eminence...they should be bound but not flattened,
restrained with gentleness but not given too much licence.
In the Romance de la Rose, a lengthy
thirteenth century French poem by two French authors, the Old Women character
offers advice on the question of support for the bust if a lady has an
ample bosom:
And if her breasts are too full, let
her take a kerchief or scarf and wrap it round her ribs to bind her
bosom, and then fasten it with a stitch or knot; she will then be able
to disport herself.
In is book Love Locked Out by James
Cleugh, the author stated in his chapter on Priveledge, that 'the breasts
were accentuated, as in modern times, by well stuffed leathern pouches',
although he fails to state his source for this. I have not seen any other
reference to breast stuffing to support this claim, although tight lacing
to enhance the figure seems to be not unlikely. It is also unclear whether
this was a widespread phenomenon or whether it was restricted to ladies
of ill repute.
In any instance, it does seem that support for enhancement or suppression
of the bust was given in material form of some kind.
Copyright
© Rosalie Gilbert
All text & photographs within this site are the property of Rosalie
Gilbert unless stated.
Artifact images remain the property of the owner.
Images and text may not be copied and used without permission.
|